-
Mar 01 2019 IoT Product Developers Need Freedom and Ecosystem Support
With product developers focusing more on IoT applications, the need for ecosystem support and professional tools to help them get their concepts to market is greater than ever.
Individual product developers and developer communities continue to be key drivers of IoT innovation, meaning large technology vendors leveraging these innovations into industry-transforming architectures need to maintain a delicate balance, allowing developers freedom to pursue their own paths, while providing them with tools to turn visions into reality.
“There is so much innovation coming from developer communities, but putting up a lot of corporate constructs around them would be constraining,” said Bob Merriman, director of strategic planning at Avnet. “Supporting them within the frame of an ecosystem is really important.”
The need for ecosystem support and professional tools to help product developers get their concepts to market is greater than ever, as suggested by the results of Avnet’s recent Product Developer Index survey, which collected the opinions of 1,190 of the combined 1.3 million members of the Hackster.io and Element14 developer communities.
Among those surveyed, 61 percent said IoT and sensors are the most important technologies they are currently working with, overshadowing in significance technology segments such as robotics and drones. Also, 26 percent of developers called IoT the most improved technology of 2018, giving IoT the edge even over the red-hot field of artificial intelligence, which finished second at 25 percent.
While even the most ardent IoT enthusiasts may be growing cautious about the notion of attaching sensors to anything and everything, Merriman said the survey results suggest sensor technology continues to be “one of the most underrated technologies in IoT.” “We’re not near the top of the mountain yet in terms of what can be done with them,” he said.
That potential has driven a boom in product developers starting up and targeting IoT in recent years, but it doesn’t take long for many of them to encounter the practical business and technology challenges that accompany their ambition.
Time and cost were mentioned by Avnet survey respondents as the biggest general challenges developers faced in moving from design phases to manufacturing. About 34 percent of developers surveyed said obtaining enough financing was a major challenge. Likely because of that more than 37 percent of survey respondents said they sought out partners to help them bring their products to market.
“They run into that age-old problem of startups — the ‘Death Valley Curve,’” Merriman said. “They sometimes don’t have enough money to fully realize their projects, but they can’t generate the revenue yet that could help them do that, and they’re stuck in between.”
That makes it especially important for Avnet and other large technology product firms to be ready to support developers from very early stages through later stages of getting to market, with tools such as design services, prototyping capabilities and product certification assistance. Some may even need help with technology selection, as 26 percent of those surveyed by Avnet said that identifying the best technology to use in their designs was a major challenge. At the latter end of the go-to-market spectrum, about 22 percent cited the ability to obtain product certification as a particular difficulty.
Aside from those business and operational concerns, security continues to be a major challenge for developers. Eighty-one percent of those surveyed said it is the biggest technological hurdle they face in IoT deployments.
On that issue, the results of Avnet’s survey echoed what similar studies have said. For example, an Evans Data survey from last summer found that more than two-thirds of developers working on IoT projects were addressing how to optimize security on their devices and applications. Their own pain may have caused them to prioritize security optimization, as 70 percent of the developers from that study indicated they already had been affected by a security breach.
It’s no surprise then to see companies like Avnet now adding more security support tools to their ecosystem offerings. At last week’s Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, Avnet unveiled a developer starter kit for using Microsoft Azure Sphere to secure IoT devices and applications.
While IoT developers face many challenges even before they can put their products in front of customers, there are indications that with ecosystem support some things are getting easier. Fifty-eight percent of those surveyed by Avnet said the process of developing and testing prototypes has become a smoother one – 17 percent more said so last year. Developers also reported that other processes, such as identifying technology sources and scaling up production, also are on the upswing.
In many cases, such improvements would not have been realized without developers’ participation in strong ecosystems. “The ecosystem support is what separates the haves from the have-nots in this space,” Merriman said. “No one out there has everything they need to succeed all on their own.”
Source: https://www.iotworldtoday.com/2019/01/14/iot-product-developers-need-freedom-and-ecosystem-support/
-
Mar 01 2019 Trusted Platform Modules: 8 Surprises for IoT Security
Trusted Platform Modules are poorly understood by many, well understood by few.
Built into billions of devices, a Trusted Platform Module (TPM) is usually a specialized chip on an endpoint’s motherboard that stores cryptographic keys on behalf of its host system for authentication and protection of the endpoint. Each TPM chip contains one or more unique key pairs, certified by the vendor, called endorsement keys (EKs), for validating the TPM’s authenticity. A TPM can also store platform “measurements” that identify software and firmware running on the platform. To stop the TPM from protecting the system, a hacker would have to interfere with it physically. In addition to their popularity on the PC and network side, TPMs will be architected into billions of Internet of Things devices.
Surprise 1: TPMs are passive, not active devices. They do not control anything on the host system they are embedded on.
A widespread misconception is that a trusted platform module somehow controls the system it’s a part of, but a TPM is 100 percent passive with respect to the rest of the system.
The trusted platform module is a self-contained component that has its own storage and processing capabilities, which it uses for protected operations on internal resources such as keys and measurements. These resources, however, are data that are given to the TPM, or that it is asked to generate.
Typically, boot code uses the TPM to store measurements of software running on the system, and applications use the TPM to protect the application’s keys and report measurements. These activities are all externally driven, not initiated by the TPM.
Surprise 2: A TPM is only useful when other things in the device take advantage of it.
The TPM is part of a broader security ecosystem that includes everything from the BIOS to motherboards to account passwords. To obtain value from the TPM, system designers must create systems that rely on the TPM’s internal resources. In traditional TPM implementations, software is “measured” before it is run in order to identify rogue software. The measurements are stored in the TPM, giving it second-hand awareness of “bad” software. The TPM will protect keys it holds, refusing access to rogue software that does not meet the expected measurements. For example, for solutions like Microsoft Bitlocker, an attacker booting to the wrong OS could not decrypt data on the hard drive. Similarly, a TPM might not allow a key to be used to authenticate a device to a bank, preventing an attacker from unauthorized account access.
With proper integration, a TPM can support the security of billions of future IoT devices that would otherwise be difficult to protect. By creating system dependencies on a TPM for devices like automotive electronic control units (ECU), system designers can make it much more difficult to swap out a system component without detection.
Surprise 3: A TPM doesn’t help much — if at all — with the heralded secure boot.
Secure boot is a hot topic. Upon startup, a device should run only the authorized code, not rogue software planted by a malicious actor. However, TPMs don’t provide secure boot. This occurs before the TPM comes into play. When a system powers on, early boot code (such as a UEFI BIOS) must decide which software will run next and which measurements are sent to the TPM. After the secure boot decisions are made, then the TPM can be used. The currently-running software can use the TPM to authenticate or decrypt the next piece of software before it loads, but this does not protect a system if an attacker can get at the early boot code.
The TPM can support a well-designed boot process (including “measured boot” or “trusted boot,” which we will discuss later), but the TPM has no impact on a secure boot.
Surprise 4: TPM has not been particularly successful considering how long it’s been available.
TPM has withstood significant scrutiny and is well established in the security community. Given TPM’s favorable reputation, its longevity (more than 20 years and counting) and the fact that TPMs have shipped in volume in PCs since 2005, it’s surprising how few people really know how to work with them. As a result — especially in the IoT realm — TPMs are not being tapped to their full potential. TPMs became a ubiquitous checkoff item on RFPs for PC-related projects and appear in billions of devices today, but most devices use TPMs minimally, or not at all.
The good news: TPM 2.0 is more flexible than the original TPM specification, allowing the newest TPMs to be applied to many embedded applications, including industrial sensors and smart home devices. Example: There is a TPM 2.0 profile for using TPM on limited-functionality ECUs for automotive applications. Now, designers and developers can more easily select granular TPM functions, whether for vehicles or a valve controller at a water utility.
Surprise 5: Leveraging TPMs is exceedingly difficult. They were not designed to be user-friendly… and they’re not.
It took the top companies in the PC industry — Compaq, HP, IBM, Intel, Microsoft and others — years to build the ecosystem needed to make implementation of TPMs for PCs feasible. These companies carved out the TPM space, driving updates to hardware, firmware and software and defining new protocols. The expectation (or at least hope) was that with this infrastructure, TPM would become an effective enabler, acting like an interstate highway for security. That is, they would provide a smooth, straight, easy way to get to the destination. Unfortunately, TPM turned out to be so complicated that even with this rich ecosystem, almost nobody built solutions to leverage it.
Surprise 6: TPMs aren’t cheap.
Keep in mind, TPMs are hardware. Then, remember they’re not just hardware. Implementing a TPM solution also entails software, the device’s physical design, re-architecture of the system and modifications to integrate with the broader infrastructure. Adding a TPM could increase the cost of a device by fifty cents or more. For many embedded applications, that added cost is a dealbreaker. For devices already being re-architected or that have high security requirements, like those used to operate and secure industrial sites or critical infrastructure, the incremental cost is more likely to be justifiable.
Surprise 7: If a TPM is only used as a secure repository for encryption keys, money is probably being wasted.
Despite having a range of capabilities, TPMs are often used solely to protect symmetric or asymmetric keys, but simpler hardware or software-based designs can often do that job just as well as a TPM. If your platform already has a TPM, by all means, use it for key protection, but if you have a TPM, why not take advantage of the TPM’s more powerful features such as measurement-based access control and remote attestation?
Surprise 8: To retrofit an existing system, a hardware TPM is a non-starter.
Forget about it. Here’s why: the TPM must be architected into the overall system from the beginning. It’s not a last-minute add-on to plug in once a device has been produced. It’s hardware, and the platform must physically accommodate it. Moreover, the TPM must be fully integrated into the boot process and security functions of the platform.
Firmware or software-based TPMs offer alternatives. They are typically less secure than hardware-based TPM, but they can more easily be integrated into your design.
Source: https://www.iotworldtoday.com/2019/02/07/trusted-platform-modules-8-surprises-for-iot-security/
-
Mar 01 2019 Bosch: Why AI and IoT Demand a New Problem-Solving Approach
Bosch’s North American president sheds light on how artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things are changing how industrial companies innovate.
In the center of Bosch’s CES booth was the prototype of an autonomous electric shuttle with a slew of surprising features. Riders can open the door of the vehicle using a smartphone app known as Perfectly Keyless. Once in the vehicle, a passenger has access to a concierge service that can inform a passenger if, say, an upcoming flight has been canceled and which alternate flight they would prefer. The concept vehicle also was equipped with camera sensors that could detect if a rider is about to leave an object behind when exiting the shuttle. The same sensors can determine when the vehicle needs to have its interior cleaned.
Such experimental prototypes are important for an engineering-focused company like Bosch because of the feedback about the types of features the public, city officials and other demographic segments value. With the shuttle (pictured below), the company wanted to “paint the picture of what could be,” said Mike Mansuetti, president of Bosch North America, pictured above on the right. And from there, they can use feedback from such experiments to better understand what should be. Many AI- and IoT-enabled projects sound nice in the abstract, but can still fail to win the support of end users.
The emerging technologies such as AI and IoT offer “endless” possibilities, Mansuetti said
So it is important that engineers are working to help solve customers’ pain points rather than develop gee-whiz technology for its own sake. “We’re very focused on user experience,” Mansuetti said. In a Bosch context, that means both getting feedback from potential users about prototypes such as the e-shuttle, but also asking open-ended questions such as: “What is your biggest problem?”
When asking questions like that, the answers can be occasionally stupefying for the company’s engineers, Mansuetti said. For instance, city officials might say their municipality’s biggest challenge is crime, a high school dropout rate or high infant mortality, and then follow up with a question of their own: “How can you help us?”
But ultimately, such information can spur further brainstorming for the company’s engineers and executives, who can then investigate the role that, say, transportation might play in such matters. “It is just a mindset change in the organization,” Mansuetti said.
Technologies such as AI and IoT are helping drive closer collaborations across its four core divisions, which span mobility solutions, consumer goods, industrial technology and energy and building technology. “We are starting to see more of the work happening horizontally in the organization,” Mansuetti explained.
The prospect of autonomous shuttles becoming mainstream in the not-too-distant future led Bosch engineers to wonder how to handle potential problems that arise in such vehicles when no person is physically present to address them. “That’s where this idea around in-vehicle sensing came,” Mansuetti said. “When you think about transportation as a service now, or mobility as a service, what are all those things that could happen?” A passenger could leave a smartphone or wallet behind, step into a dirty vehicle or a physical confrontation could occur between two passengers in the vehicle. “When nobody’s there, then you just start thinking about these things.” And it is this thought process that led the company to develop prototype solutions for such challenges.
While the company is hoping to play a pivotal role in helping commercialize such autonomous vehicles, it will rely on partners to produce the end product. “The intent is really not to go into the shuttle business just like we would never probably enter into building a car,” Mansuetti said. “We are focused on electronics and technology: Why would we want to put the sheet metal together? That’s just not something that we want to do.”
In other words, that’s a problem the company has decided is not worth solving.
Source: https://www.iotworldtoday.com/2019/02/07/bosch-why-ai-and-iot-demand-a-new-problem-solving-approach/
-
Mar 01 2019 Ericsson reveals vision for next-gen cellular IoT solutions
Ericsson is empowering service providers across multiple industries to address a larger part of the IoT market with the help of its newly introduced next-generation cellular solutions.
These solutions will help proliferation of the cellular IoT evolution in what Ericsson sees as four market segments: broadband IoT, industrial automation IoT, massive IoT, and critical IoT.
Among those, industrial automation IoT and broadband IoT are two segments that are new; the former will allow advanced industrial automation applications with the most demanding connectivity requirements, whereas the latter adopts mobile broadband capabilities for IoT and supports higher data rates and lower latencies than massive IoT.
In accordance with its vision,
Ericsson is launching enhanced functionalities for massive IoT and new solutions for Broadband IoT. The 100km extension of NB-IoT cell range is one example of massive IoT enhancement, which results from stretching the standards-based limit from about 40km to 100 km via software updates without changing the existing NB-IoT devices. This benefits the rural and remote areas, especially for agriculture, logistics and environment monitoring. The company has deployed NB-IoT data connections up to 100km with Telstra and DISH.
Last month, Ericsson partnered with Deutsche Telekom to conduct a joint innovation project wherein it successfully demonstrated a millimetre wave link with data transmission rate of 40Gbps. The live trial, which was organised at the Deutsche Telekom Service Centre in Athens, is a breakthrough moment in the evolution from today’s 10Gbps reality toward the 100Gbps future. It was arranged over a hop distance of 1.4 kilometres in the millimetre wave (E-band) spectrum, which included a technical setup consisting Ericsson’s latest mobile transport technology including Ericsson’s MINI-LINK 6352 microwave solution and Router 6000.
In November, the Swedish telecom giant was selected by DISH for radio access and core network for its Narrowband Internet of Things (NB-IoT) network scheduled for March 2020. Ericsson leveraged its global wireless radio expertise to complete the initial radio frequency (RF) design for DISH’s nationwide NB-IoT network earlier in 2018.
-
Mar 01 2019 Study reveals laxness among automakers in terms of cybersecurity
An independent study conducted by Ponemon Institute found that 30% of the automotive companies do not have their own cybersecurity programme or a team. It also found that these companies do not even hire external organisations to secure the software used in their products.
Moreover, the survey shows that around 63% of all automotive firms are heedless when it comes to testing vulnerabilities. Less than half of software, hardware, and other technologies they develop remain untested.
Commissioned by Synopsys and SAE International, the study used a sampling frame of 15,900 IT security practitioners and engineers in the automotive sector, in which the final sample comprised of 593 surveys. In order to make sure that the responses provided are relevant, the Ponemon Institute chose only those respondents who were either involved in assessing or contributing to the security of automotive components in their organisation.
The Report
The report says: “The security professionals surveyed for our report indicated that the typical automotive organisation has only nine full-time employees in its product cybersecurity management program.” According to the report, 60% of all responders lack understanding and training on secure coding practices, which is the key reason behind all vulnerabilities in the automotive software, components and technology. Among the respondents, 50% said that the lack of quality assurance and testing procedures, 55% mentioned accidental coding errors, and 40% highlighted the use of insecure/outdated open source software components as the most common factors that lead to vulnerabilities in their technologies.
“Seventy-three percent of respondents surveyed in our report say they are very concerned about the cybersecurity posture of automotive technologies supplied by third parties. However, only 44% of respondents say their organisations impose cybersecurity requirements for products provided by upstream suppliers.”
Security vulnerabilities have been found most of the times as software has been added to vehicles. For instance: In April 2018, a Dutch cyber-security firm found that in-vehicle infotainment (IVI) systems used by some car models from the Volkswagen Group were vulnerable to remote hacking. And in October 2017, an electronics designer discovered a fault in the key fob system of several Subaru models. This security issue was refused by Subaru to patch when contacted and that could potentially be abused to hijack its customers’ cars.
Source: https://www.iottechnews.com/news/2019/feb/07/study-automakers-terms-cybersecurity/
-
Şub 28 2019 Vodafone Nesnelerin İnternetine Yönelik Araştırmanın Sonuçlarını Açıkladı
Vodafone Grubu, “IoT Barometresi” adıyla yaptığı nesnelerin internetine yönelik araştırmanın son sonuçlarını açıkladı. Peki nesnelerin interneti IoT nedir?
Sahip olduğu 80,9 milyon bağlantı ile Nesnelerin İnterneti Teknolojisi’nde (IoT) dünya lideri olan Vodafone Grubu, “IoT Barometresi” adıyla yaptığı araştırmanın son sonuçlarını açıkladı. Barometre, küresel çapta işletmelerin üçte birinden fazlasının IoT uygulamalarını kullandığını ortaya koyarken, IoT kullanan işletmelerin yüzde 74’ü, bu teknolojiyi kullanmayanların beş yıl içinde rakiplerinin gerisine düşeceğini öngörüyor.
Dünya çapında sahip olduğu 80,9 milyon bağlantı ile Nesnelerin İnterneti Teknolojisi’nde (IoT) dünya lideri olan Vodafone Grubu, ‘IoT Barometresi’ araştırmasının son sonuçlarını paylaştı. Dünya çapında 1.758 işletmenin katıldığı IoT Barometresi, bugün işletmelerin yüzde 34 ile üçte birinden fazlasının IoT’yi kullandığını, teknolojiyi kullananların yüzde 70’inin pilot aşamasının ötesine geçtiğini, yüzde 95’inin ise ana akım haline geldikçe, bu alana yatırım yapmanın avantajlarını gördüğünü ortaya koyuyor. Bu arada halihazırda IoT kullanan işletmelerin yüzde 74’ü, bu teknolojiyi kullanmayanların, beş yıl içinde rakiplerinin gerisine düşeceğini söylüyor.
Araştırmalar IoT’nin büyüklükleri ve sektörleri ne olursa olsun işletmeleri etkilediğini gösterirken çalışmaya göre, IoT kullanan işletmelerin yüzde 60’ı, bu teknolojinin sektörü kökten değiştirdiğini ya da beş yıl içinde değiştirebileceğini belirtiyor. IoT kullanmaya başlayanların yüzde 84’ü bu teknolojiye olan güveninin arttığını bildirirken, %83’ü ise sunduğu avantajların tamamından faydalanmak amacıyla, IoT uygulamalarının ölçeğini artırıyor.
Şirketlerin yüzde 53’ü IoT’yi en ileri düzeyde kullanıyor
Rapor, aynı zamanda IoT kullanımına yönelik strateji, entegrasyon ve uygulamalarını değerlendirerek işletmeleri derecelendiriyor. Buna göre global olarak, IoT kullanan şirketlerin yüzde 53’ü beş kategori arasından en üstteki iki kategoride yer alıyor. Bölgesel olarak en gelişmiş seviyede bulunan Kuzey ve Güney Amerika’da şirketlerin yüzde 67’si en üstteki iki kategoride yer alırken, Asya Pasifik’te bu oran yüzde 51, Avrupa’da ise yüzde 46 olarak tespit edildi. Bu sonuç, Kuzey ve Güney Amerika’daki işletmelerin diğer pazarlardakilerden daha hızlı ilerlediğini, münferit projelerden koordinasyona dayalı stratejik programlara geçtiğini ortaya koyuyor.
En üst düzeydekilerin yüzde 87’si IoT’den ciddi getiri veya fayda sağlıyor
Çalışmada en gelişmiş düzeydeki şirketlerin yüzde 87’si IoT’den ciddi getiri veya fayda sağladığını belirtirken, “başlangıç” seviyesindekilerde bu oran sadece yüzde 17’de kalıyor. Teknolojiyi kullananların yüzde 76’sı IoT’nin vazgeçilmez önemde olduğunu belirtiyor. Hatta bazıları “IoT olmadan iş yapmayı hayal dahi edemiyor”, teknolojiyi kullananların yüzde 8’i “tüm işlerinin IoT’ye dayandığını” söylüyor. Barometreye göre, geleceğe bakıldığında geliştirilen yeni teknolojiler, IoT’nin performansına güç vermeye devam edecek. Teknolojiyi kullananların yüzde 52 ile yarısından fazlası, 5G’yi kullanmayı planlıyor, ki bu da daha yüksek veri hacimlerinin desteklenmesini, güvenilirliği artırmayı ve sıfıra yakın gecikme sunmayı vaat ediyor.Vodafone IoT teknolojileri, halen Aston Martin, Audi, BMW, Mercedes Benz, Ford, Jaguar Land Rover, Lamborghini, Porsche, VW ve Yamaha scooter’larında kullanılıyor. Vodafone’un IoT şebeke ve servisleri aynı zamanda Centrica, EDF ve nPower gibi enerji şirketleri için akıllı sayaç yeteneklerini de destekliyor ve Amazon Kindle gibi tüketici elektroniği ürünleri ile Bosch, Panasonic ve Philips Aydınlatma tarafından imal edilen cihazlara bağlanabilirlik imkânı sunuyor.
Stefano Gastaut: “Şirketlerin IoT ile en güçlü faydayı sağlamak için kendini teknolojiye adayabilmesi gerekiyor”
Barometre sonuçlarını değerlendiren Vodafone Business IoT CEO’su Stefano Gastaut, şunları söyledi: “Gitgide dijitalleşen bir dünyada IoT, şirketlerin başarısında merkezi bir rol oynuyor, ki zaten IoT kullanıcılarının %72’si de IoT’siz dijital dönüşümün mümkün olmadığını söylüyor. IoT platformları her ölçekte şirket için teknoloji kullanımını kolaylaştırıyor ve Darbantta Nesnelerin İnterneti (NB-IoT) ve 5G ile IoT hizmetleri ve potansiyeli daha da artacak. Bu ortamda, şirketlerin IoT kullanımlarını geliştirip geliştirmeyeceklerini değil, nasıl geliştireceklerini değerlendirmeleri ve mümkün olan en yüksek faydayı elde etmek için teknolojiyi tamamen sahiplenmeleri gerekiyor.”
Meltem Bakiler Şahin: “İşletmeleri dijitalleşmenin sunduğu fırsatlarla buluşturmaya devam edeceğiz”
Barometre sonuçlarının, IoT alanındaki küresel trend ve anlayışı ortaya koyması açısından oldukça önemli olduğunu dile getiren Vodafone Türkiye İcra Kurulu Başkan Yardımcısı Meltem Bakiler Şahin, şöyle konuştu:“Günümüzde artık global işletmeler IoT’nin, rekabet edebilirlik için olmazsa olmaz olduğu görüşünde. 5G’ye geçişle birlikte, hayatımızdaki küçük-büyük neredeyse tüm cihazlar çevrimiçi hale gelecek ve IoT daha da ön plana çıkacak. 2025 yılı itibariyle yaratacağı 6,2 trilyon dolarlık ekonomik büyüklükle IoT ayrıca, işletmeler için büyük fırsatlar da sunuyor. Biz de bu fırsatları, IoT’de dünya lideri olan Grubumuzun yetkinliğinden aldığımız güçle, Türkiye’deki işletmeler için yakalanır kılmak için çalışıyoruz. Bu alanda öncü yatırımlar yapıyor, dijital iş ortakları olarak uçtan uca çözümlerimizle işletmelerin yanında yer alıyoruz. Kurumlar için Türkiye’de ilk kez, her sektörde bağlantılı servisleri herhangi bir altyapı yatırımına ihtiyaç duymadan hızla geliştirmeyi mümkün kılan Nesnelerin İnterneti Platformu’nu kurduk. Özellikle sanayide, mobil kapsama teknolojisiyle kapsanamayacak alanlardaki ihtiyaçları karşılamak için ise Darbantta Nesnelerin İnterneti Teknolojisi’ni (NB-IoT) kullanıma sunduk. Akıllı teknoloji merkezimiz İTÜ Vodafone Future Lab’de ise, güvenlikten atık yönetimine kadar pek çok alanda 40’a yakın IoT çözümümüzü sergiliyor, geleceğin teknolojilerinin bizzat deneyimlenmesini sağlıyor, işletmelerin ihtiyaçlarına onlarla birlikte çözüm geliştiriyoruz. Türkiye’de işletmeleri, dijitalleşmenin sunduğu fırsatlarla buluşturmaya önümüzdeki süreçte de devam edeceğiz.”
Nesnelerin İnterneti (iot) nedir?
Peki, İngilizcedeki adı internet of things olan ve kısaca iot olarak adlandırılan ve Türkçemize nesnelerin interneti olarak çevirlen kavram ne anlama gelmektedir?
Yakın gelecekte akıllı telefonlar dışında artık bir çok teknolojik nesnenin de akıllı olacağı öngörülmektedir.
Buna çok basit bir örnek vermek gerekirse; örneğin, akıllı otomobiliniz yakın gelecekte evinize yaklaştığı zaman, akıllı evinize eve yaklaştığınızı haber verecek, akıllı eviniz ise salondaki ve yatak odanızdaki klimaları devreye sokarak siz henüz gelmeden evi ısıtacak ve sizin sıcak bir eve adım atmanızı sağlayabilecek.
-
Şub 27 2019 Researchers unveil Internet of Things security feature
‘Physically unclonable function’ is 10 times more reliable than previous methods
Rice University integrated circuit (IC) designers are at Silicon Valley’s premier chip-design conference to unveil technology that is 10 times more reliable than current methods of producing unclonable digital fingerprints for Internet of Things (IoT) devices.
Rice’s Kaiyuan Yang and Dai Li will present their physically unclonable function (PUF) technology today at the 2019 International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC), a prestigious scientific conference known informally as the “Chip Olympics.” PUF uses a microchip’s physical imperfections to produce unique security keys that can be used to authenticate devices linked to the Internet of Things.
Considering that some experts expect Earth to pass the threshold of 1 trillion internet-connected sensors within five years, there is growing pressure to improve the security of IoT devices.
Yang and Li’s PUF provides a leap in reliability by generating two unique fingerprints for each PUF. This “zero-overhead” method uses the same PUF components to make both keys and does not require extra area and latency because of an innovative design feature that also allows their PUF to be about 15 times more energy efficient than previously published versions.
“Basically each PUF unit can work in two modes,” said Yang, assistant professor of electrical and computer engineering. “In the first mode, it creates one fingerprint, and in the other mode it gives a second fingerprint. Each one is a unique identifier, and dual keys are much better for reliability. On the off chance the device fails in the first mode, it can use the second key. The probability that it will fail in both modes is extremely small.”
As a means of authentication, PUF fingerprints have several of the same advantages as human fingerprints, he said.
“First, they are unique,” Yang said. “You don’t have to worry about two people having the same fingerprint. Second, they are bonded to the individual. You cannot change your fingerprint or copy it to someone else’s finger. And finally, a fingerprint is unclonable. There’s no way to create a new person who has the same fingerprint as someone else.”
PUF-derived encryption keys are also unique, bonded and unclonable. To understand why, it helps to understand that each transistor on a computer chip is incredibly small. More than a billion of them can be crammed onto a chip half the size of a credit card. But for all their precision, microchips are not perfect. The difference between transistors can amount to a few more atoms in one or a few less in another, but those miniscule differences are enough to produce the electronic fingerprints used to make PUF keys.
For a 128-bit key, a PUF device would send request signals to an array of PUF cells comprising several hundred transistors, allocating a one or zero to each bit based on the responses from the PUF cells. Unlike a numeric key that’s stored in a traditional digital format, PUF keys are actively created each time they’re requested, and different keys can be used by activating a different set of transistors.
Adopting PUF would allow chipmakers to inexpensively and securely generate secret keys for encryption as a standard feature on next-generation computer chips for IoT devices like “smart home” thermostats, security cameras and lightbulbs.
Encrypted lightbulbs?
If that sounds like overkill, consider that unsecured IoT devices are what three young computer savants assembled by the hundreds of thousands to mount the October 2016 distributed denial-of-service attack that crippled the internet on the East Coast for most of a day.
“The general concept for IoT is to connect physical objects to the internet in order to integrate the physical and cyber worlds,” Yang said. “In most consumer IoT today, the concept isn’t fully realized because many of the devices are powered and almost all use existing IC feature sets that were developed for the mobile market.”
In contrast, the devices coming out of research labs like Yang’s are designed for IoT from the ground up. Measuring just a few millimeters in size, the latest IoT prototypes can pack a processor, flash memory, wireless transmitter, antenna, one or more sensors, batteries and more into an area the size of a grain of rice.
PUF is not a new idea for IoT security, but Yang and Li’s version of PUF is unique in terms of reliability, energy efficiency and the amount of area it would take to implement on a chip. For starters, Yang said the performance gains were measured in tests at military-grade temperatures ranging from 125 degrees Celsius to minus 55 degrees Celsius and when supply voltage dropped by up to 50 percent.
“If even one transistor behaves abnormally under varying environmental conditions, the device will produce the wrong key, and it will look like an inauthentic device,” Yang said. “For that reason, reliability, or stability, is the most important measure for PUF.”
Energy efficiency also is important for IoT, where devices can be expected to run for a decade on a single battery charge. In Yang and Li’s PUF, keys are created using a static voltage rather than by actively powering up the transistor. It’s counterintuitive that the static approach would be more energy efficient because it’s the equivalent of leaving the lights on 24/7 rather than flicking the switch to get a quick glance of the room.
“Normally, people have sleep mode activated, and when they want to create a key, they activate the transistor, switch it once and then put it to sleep again,” Yang said. “In our design, the PUF module is always on, but it takes very little power, even less than a conventional system in sleep mode.”
On-chip area — the amount of space and expense manufacturers would have to allocate to put the PUF device on a production chip — is the third metric where they outperform previously reported work. Their design occupied 2.37 square micrometers to generate one bit on prototypes produced using 65-nanometer complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology.
The research was funded by Rice University.
Source: http://news.rice.edu/2019/02/20/rice-u-researchers-unveil-internet-of-things-security-feature/
-
Şub 27 2019 IoT bağlantılarının 100 milyarı aşması bekleniyor
Operatörler, 4G tarifelerin satışa sunulmasıyla her zaman büyük paralar kazanamadı. Verinin götürüleceği bölgeden o bölgedeki kullanıcıların kullanım alışkanlıkları ve tercihlerine kadar pek çok değişken var ve bu da günün sonunda “kazanç” raporunu etkiliyor.
IoT bağlantılarının 100 milyarı aşması bekleniyor
Huawei, yeni çözümleri sayesinde hem operatörlere hem de son kullanıcılara avantajlar sunuyor. Bu doğrultuda firmaların önce kullanıcıları “kullanım alışkanlıkları” doğrutulsunda kategorize etmesi ve ona göre hizmetleri yeniden planlayarak sunması gerekiyor. Böylece masraflarda düşüşler yaşanırken kullanıcılara da daha uygun tarifeler sunulabilir.
Gelelim IoT tarafına. Bildiğiniz üzere artık yaşamımızda Nesnelerin Interneti kavramı da sıklıkla yer alıyor. 2018’de IoT bağlantıları 10 milyarı geride bırakırken, 2025 tahminleri de 100 milyar bağlantının geride bırakılacağı yönünde, ki bu devasa bir ekosistem anlamını taşıyor.
Şu an itibarıyla IoT tarafında en gelişmiş bölgeler olarak Kuzey Amerika, Çin ve Batı Avrupa gösteriliyor. Bu teknolojiler sayesinde iş yapış yöntemleri de değişiyor. Huawei’nin bu tarafta sunduğu bulut tabanlı yeni servislerle birlikte iş yapış süreleri kısalırken, aynı zamanda maliyet de azalıyor. Böylece hem zamandan hem de paradan tasarruf söz konusu oluyor.
kaynak: https://www.btgunlugu.com/iot-baglantilari-mwc-2019/
-
Şub 25 2019 Schneider Electric, 2019 Global Dijital Dönüşümün Faydaları Raporu
Schneider Electric, son 5 yılda 230 müşteri projesi üzerinde yapılan ve derin ve ölçülebilir iş avantajları ortaya koyan 2019 Global Dijital Dönüşümün Faydaları Raporunu sundu.
Raporun sonucuna göre şirketler hem enerji yönetimini hem de otomasyonu dijitalleştirdiğinde daha güçlü bir değer yaratıyor.
Raporda katılımcı şirketlerin sermaye giderlerinde (mühendislik hizmetleri) %80’e varan tasarruf ve İşletme Giderlerinde (Enerji Tüketimi) %85’lik bir tasarruf görülüyor.
Enerji yönetimi ve otomasyonda dünya çapında uzman olan Schneider Electric, Global Dijital Dönüşümün Faydaları Raporunu sundu. Rapor, Schneider Electric’in EcoStruxure mimarisini kullanan 41 ülkeden 230 projeyi baz alıyor. Son 5 yılı kapsayan raporda amaç, enerji yönetimi ve otomasyon alanında dijital dönüşümün potansiyeli hakkında fonksiyonel ve gerçekçi bir değerlendirme sunmak.
Raporun merkezinde dijital dönüşümün 12 temel iş avantajı yer alıyor. Ayrıca bu avantajlardan her biri etkin piyasa rekabeti açısından önemli üç kategoriye ayrılarak değerlendiriliyor.
Bunlar; sermaye giderleri (CapEx), işletme giderleri (OpEx) ve sürdürülebilirlik, hız ve performanstan oluşuyor. Rapor, insanların yaşam ve çalışma tarzında temel değişimlere önderlik eden dört kilit sektöre odaklanıyor; binalar, veri merkezleri, sanayi ve altyapı.
Schneider Electric Yönetim Kurulu Başkanı ve CEO’su Jean-Pascal Tricoire şirketin hazırladığı rapor hakkında şunları ifade etti; “Dijital dönüşüm şirket çapında tutarlılık ve verimlilik sunmanın tek yoludur. Nesnelerin İnterneti (IoT), yapay zeka ve büyük veri analizi gibi teknolojiler, şirketleri daha verimli ve yenilikçi hale getirerek rekabet avantajlarını artırıyor.
Raporumuz dijital dönüşümün tam potansiyelini ortaya çıkarmak üzere bu karmaşıklığı yönetmek için şirketlerin ve kuruluşların güvenilir bir otoriteye ihtiyaç duyduğunu gösteriyor. EcoStruxure™ üzerine kurulu olan teknolojilerimiz, dijitalleşmenin gücünü kullanarak müşterilerimizin daha verimli, güvenli, güvenilir, bağlı ve sürdürülebilir hale gelmelerini ve bu sayede Yeni Dijital Ekonominin liderleri olmalarını sağlıyor.”
Sermaye Gideri ve İşletme Gideri tasarruflarında kayda değer dönüşüm
Rapor gösteriyor ki genel yargının aksine dijital dönüşüm için gerekli sermaye giderleri çok büyük bütçeler gerektirmiyor. Raporda incelenen müşteri projelerinde yer alan yeni sistemler ve entegrasyon sanıldığı kadar pahalı değil.
Aynı zamanda çalışma, mühendislik süreçlerinin dijitalleştirilmesinin şirketlerin ve kuruluşların sermaye giderlerinde ortalama %35 tasarruf ve zaman optimizasyonu sağlayabileceğini kanıtlıyor. Dahası, yeni sistemlerin ve varlıkların işletmeye entegre edilme maliyetleri de ortalama %29 azaltılabiliyor.
Çalışma ayrıca IoT kullanımı sayesinde dijitalleşmenin işletme giderlerinde önemli tasarruflar sağlayarak verimlilik, güvenilirlik, güvenlik ve sürdürülebilirlik konularında önemli iyileştirmeler sağlayabileceğine işaret ediyor. Şirketler ve kuruluşlar dijitalleşme sonucunda enerji tüketiminde ortalama %24 tasarruf sağladıklarını bildiriyorlar.
Dijital dönüşüm, sanayi uygulamalarında şirketlerin daha az kaynakla daha fazla iş üretmesini sağlıyor. Yani daha az enerji, daha az malzeme ve daha düşük işçilik maliyetiyle daha yüksek getiri sunuyor. Değer zinciri boyunca sağlanan enerji yönetimi ve otomasyon verimlilikleri, IoT özellikli otomatikleştirilmiş üretim hatlarına kadar %50’ye varan üretkenlik artışı getiriyor.
EcoStruxure™ ile gelişmiş güvenlik, sürdürülebilirlik ve bağlantı mümkün
Schneider Electric dijital dönüşüm yolculuğuna yıllar önce başladı. Schneider Electric 2009 yılında IoT özellikli, açık ve birlikte çalışmaya uygun mimarisi ve platformu olan EcoStruxure™’ ürününü piyasaya sürdü.
Bugün bulut ve dijital hizmetler konusunda zenginleştirilmiş olan EcoStruxure™, gelişmiş güvenlik, güvenilirlik, verimlilik, sürdürülebilirlik ve bağlantı sunuyor. EcoStruxure™, IoT, mobilite, algılama, bulut, analitikler ve siber güvenlik alanlarındaki gelişmelerden faydalanarak, bağlı ürünlerden, kontrol ve izleme çözümlerine kadar her seviyede inovasyon sağlıyor.
EcoStruxure™, şimdiye dek 40’tan fazla dijital hizmet aracılığıyla sayıları 20.000’i geçen sistem entegratörünün desteğiyle 1,6 milyondan fazla cihaz arasında bağlantı kuracak şekilde 480.000’den fazla lokasyonda uygulandı. EcoStruxure™ ürününün geliştirilmesi ile Schneider Electric’in 2017 satışlarının %45’i IoT bağlantılı olduğu açıklandı.
Kaynak: https://www.sektorumdergisi.com/2019-global-dijital-donusumun-faydalari-raporu/
-
Şub 22 2019 18 dakikada dijital dönüşüm
Digital Acceleration Challenge (Dijital Dönüşümü Hızlandırma) atölye çalışması, üst düzey yönetici araştırma ve değerlendirme şirketi Odgers Berndtson’un ‘Bir Gün CEO’ programı kapsamında cuma günü yapıldı. Demirören Medya’nın da sponsor olduğu Bir Gün CEO programı, geleceğin umut vadeden liderlerini en erken seviyede keşfetmek ve onların iş dünyasını birinci elden deneyimlemelerini amaçlıyor. Digital Acceleration Challenge atölyesi de bu bağlamda kurgulanmış. Koç Digital’in katkıları ile Boston Consulting Group (BCG) New York ofisi ortaklarının yönetiminde yürütülen atölyenin odak noktası dijital dönüşümdü.
SİMÜLASYON DENEYİMİ
Çalışmada Baymak Genel Müdürü Ender Çolak, Deloitte Türkiye CEO’su Humphry Hatton, Kale Seramik, Genel Müdürü Okan Gedik, KoçSistem Genel Müdürü Mehmet Ali Akarca, Nobel İlaç Genel Müdürü Hakan Şahin, Candy Hoover CEO’su Servet Akkaynak, Gedik Holding Yönetim Kurulu Başkanı Hülya Gedik, HSBC CEO’su Selim Kervancı, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi CEO’su Ecmel Ayral, Maersk Doğu Akdeniz Bölge Başkanı Sedef Ayhan, Koç Digital Genel Müdürü Önder Kaplancık ve üniversitelerden öğrenciler yer aldı. Liderler ve öğrencilerden oluşan takımlar notebook’lardaki özel simülasyon programı aracılığıyla 18 aylık bir dijital dönüşüm sürecini 18 dakikalık bir deneyim olarak yaşadılar. Öğrenciler, çalışma sürecinde aldıkları kararların sonuçlarını ve öngöremedikleri tehlikeleri gerçek zamanlı olarak yaşadılar. Atılan adımların kilit performans göstergelerine (KPI) olan etkisini deneyimlediler ve dijital dönüşümle ilgili temel kavramları öğrendiler.Bu kurgu ve simülatif öğrenme deneyimi sonucunda dijital dönüşüm yolculuğu ve içerdiği zorluklarla ilgili tüm katılımcıların farkındalıklarının yükselmesi, grup içinde yorumlar yapılıp farklı perspektiflerin tartışılması mümkün oldu. Ayrıca, farklı nesillerden oluşan katılımcılar birbirleriyle diyalog ve ilişki kurma, motivasyonlarını daha yakından anlama fırsatı buldular.
Çalışma süresince liderler ve öğrencilerle iletişim halinde olan Odgers Berndtson Türkiye Yönetici Ortağı Ayşe Öztuna Bozoklar, iş dünyasının dört neslin birlikte meselelere çözüm bulması gereken bir dönüşüm sürecinden geçtiğini belirtti. Ayşe Öztuna Bozoklar, Türkiye’de de farklı nesillerden yeteneklerin ancak ortak akıl yaratarak ve multi-disipliner yaklaşımlarla işbirliği yaparak başarılı olabileceğini vurguladı.
Kaynak: http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/ik-yeni-ekonomi/18-dakikada-dijital-donusum-41120578